|
|
|
"IDEAS FOR DEMOCRATS, VI: ATTACK ON DEFENSE, II” Steven Jonas, MD, MPH Last
week I presented a series of defense/national security issues/positions intended
to show how the Democrats can go over onto the offensive in this political and
realm. In the interim it has become clear that doing so will be essential if the
Democrats are going to have any chance at all to retake either House of Congress
much less both. Karl Rove has made it clear what he will have the
Republicans running on so-called “national security” and “national
strength” planks. (Believe me, indicted or not, cooperating witness [and
we won’t find out about that until the Libby trial next year] or not, Rove
will running the national Republican campaign at least for this year.).
The Republican posture and posturing will not be on the war per se. Given the
disaster that the war is for both Rove
knows better than any other modern political consultant that, as I have said
before here and elsewhere, there are two principal elements to the strategy for
winning elections. First is to control the agenda. Second is
“Always attack; never defend.” In 2000, 2002, and 2004 Rove
demonstrated his genius for arranging things his way and the Democrats
demonstrated their genius for falling onto his trap every time. Last week
we discussed the DLC’s current strategy, essentially a re-run of theirs in the
three previous national elections: “by golly, we’ll argue on your agenda.”
As we saw, they are doing it again. If they control what the national
Democratic Party does, losses in both 2006 and 2008 are all but assured (unless
there is Deus Machina, like absolute proof that the Georgites arranged 9/11 or
the next Great Depression arrives). They want to be “muscular,” but
being “muscular” in the Roveite way, “‘Staying the course’ equals
‘muscular’ and everything else doesn’t,” plays right into his hands.
They cannot win with that one. The
truly “muscular” Democratic position would be not “we can do these people
one better.” It would be to set our agenda, which means a) ignoring
Rove’s and b) always attacking, never defending (a major part of which is
indeed setting the agenda). Here is summary of the attack points that I
made last week, followed by a positive proposal for each. By the way, some
of these will be considered “tough.” Yes, being tough would be unusual
for Democrats, but when Republicans in the Congress make speeches saying the
Democrats who do not support Bush’s open-ended 1.
9/11 happened on Bush’s watch, despite ample warnings. Why should the
nation trust him on security any longer? 2.
They may have caught and killed al-Zarqawi but according to our own military,
al-Qaeda is a very small factor in the Iraqi insurgency. 3.
If the Georgites did not mis-lead about the reasons for going into 4.
They have depleted and weakened our armed services in fighting a war for which
it is ill-equipped and not properly trained. 5.
They have turned the world against us (see the recent Pew Research international
poll). 6.
They have created large numbers of new terrorists, not reduced their ranks. 7.
They have done virtually nothing to strengthen homeland security in the
homeland. 8.
They are totally incompetent in handling natural disasters. They could be
even worse in handling man-made ones. 9.
They have depleted the national treasury by going to war on borrowed money while
making the nation’s rich even richer with their ever-expanding tax cuts. 10.
They love military solutions to problems that cannot be solved using the
military. And
so, here is a set of positive programs to deal with the listed massive
deficiencies*: 1.
Create a truly effective national counter-intelligence/counter-terrorism
program, like the one proposed by Richard Clarke on the day Bush took office and
rejected by Ashcroft the day before 9/11. It would begin with the
reorganization and depoliticization of both the FBI and the CIA. 2.
Develop a world-wide program to find al Qaeda where it exists, which is not
principally in 3.
To establish as policy to share as much information about military and
intelligence operations with Congress and the American people as possible, not
as little as they think they can get away with. 4.
I have dealt with the subject of 5.
We must re-establish a multi-lateral foreign policy, to develop the allies that
we will increasingly be in need of in the future, and we must turn towards the
UN, not turn our back on it at our peril as we are doing now. 6.
We must develop a homeland security system that focuses first and foremost on
the tasks at hand like strengthening port security, not at developing evermore
sophisticated systems for spying on Americans and violating the basics premises
and provisions of Constitutional Democracy. 7.
We must develop an entirely Federal-state-local coordinated and properly funded
system for predicting and reacting to natural disasters. 8.
For as long as we remain in If
our arguments are to be winning ones, they must be formulated on our agenda, not
Rove’s. For starters, one simply does not respond to “cut and run,” unless
one wants to say: “The only cutters and runners in this situation are the
Republicans. They cut the intelligence to fit their pre-ordained agenda
and ran into a war they just had to have.” But the primary argument must
be that “all the way down the line, the Bush Administration has made our
country not safer, but less safe, much less safe. We Democrats can do
better, much better.” *
Please note that I most recently presented a detailed proposal for dealing with
the war issue itself on The
Political Junkies.net of 15 December, 2005, my Column No. 89 "AN IRAQ EXIT
PROPOSAL." ________________ Dr. Steven Jonas is a contributing author for The Political Junkies
(www.thepoliticaljunkies.net).
He is a
Professor of Preventive Medicine at Stony Brook University (NY) and
author/co-author of over twenty books. Dr. Jonas is one of He is also the author of The 15% Solution: A Political
History of American Fascism, 2001-2022. Under the pseudonym
"Jonathan Westminster" this book was originally published in 1996.
It was republished with a New Introduction in 2004. Under Georgite rule,
the “fictional non-fiction” scenario of this work of “future history”
is, most unfortunately, becoming all too real, now almost day-by-day. The 2004 edition is available at www.barnesandnoble.com
(search with the book title) and www.xlibris.com
(click on “Bookstore,” then “Search” with the title). Both
versions are available at www.amazon.com
(go to "Books;" search with the title). Dr. Jonas is also a Contributing Editor
for the Weblog http://planetarymovement.org/blog/, produced by The Planetary
Movement Ltd. UK (http://planetarymovement.org/blog/), TPJ's own Michael
Carmichael, President and Chief Executive Officer, a Contributing
Columnist for the Project for the Old American Century, POAC (http://www.oldamericancentury.org/),
on which his TPJ columns appear regularly, and a Columnist for the webmagazine
BuzzFlash (http://www.buzzflash.com/) on
which short(er) articles are published once a week or so. By invitation, Dr.
J's TPJ columns are also posted periodically on the weblog Thomas Paine's
Corner (http://civillibertarian.blogspot.com/).
2006 Jan
26, 2006 "George
Bush And The Doctrine Of Original Intent"
Nov
25, 2005 “The
Future Of The Democratic Party, VII: ‘The Ten Commitments’” Oct
27, 2005 “The
Future of the Democratic Party, IV: Sept
29, 2005 "The
Bush Flood, And The Georgites: New Orleans, III" Aug
25,2005 "Some
Thoughts On The Atomic Bombing Of Japan" July
28, 2005
“Iran
Nukes, Revisited" June
23, 2005 "Why
All Of This Repression Abroad?" May
26, 2005 "Pat
Buchanan's 'What If?'" April
28, 2005 "The
Schiavo Case, IV: The Definitions Of Life And Death" March
31, 2005 “John
Bolton And The Nuclear Option" February
24, 2005 "Going
Nuclear In Iran" Jan
27, 2005
“Comparing
George W. Bush And Adolf Hitler” Dec
30, 2004
“The
‘Unless’ of the ‘Coming Second Civil War’ Series, Part I” Oct
28, 2004
Why
The Patriot Act?” Sept
30, 2004
“Four
800 Lb. Gorillas In The Campaign Room” July
29, 2004
“Some
Thoughts For and About The Kerry Campaign, IV” May
27, 2004
“On
Fascism -- And The Georgites” April
29, 2004
“On
George Bush and Religion, Part 2” March
25, 2004
“Brief
Essays” February
27, 2004 “On
Doctor Dean” |
|
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information please review Title 17, Sec. 107 of the U.S. Code. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. © 2002- 2008 OLDAmericanCentury.org and OLDAmericanCentury.com |